Ten Areas that are Changing Market Dynamics in Web Performance Management |
Written by Bojan Simic |
December 20, 2010 |
Page 2 of 2
Dynamic Web 69% of organizations that participated in TRAC’s recent survey reported that managing dynamic content is one of the top challenges for managing Web performance. Many of these organizations are finding that some of the traditional techniques for accelerating Web performance are not as effective in dealing with the challenges of a new and more dynamic Web. For example, many organizations are realizing that traditional caching mechanisms are not as effective when used for Web applications that have a high amount of dynamic content. Web applications such as social media and those that include a high amount of user generated content are making this challenge even more prevalent with organizations. However, this trend also creates opportunities for vendors who are providing solutions that are designed for addressing this problem from different perspectives. Examples of emerging vendors that are well positioned to address this issue include Strangeloop Networks, whose solution includes several innovative techniques for caching and optimizing dynamic Web content, as well as Cotendo and FastSoft, who provide solutions for dynamic Web acceleration. New CDN strategies 29% of organizations in TRAC’s recent survey, who are deploying content delivery networks (CDN) services, reported that they are using two or more service providers, with another 10% reporting that they plan to adopt multi-vendor CDN strategy within the next 12 months. The key drivers behind this trend are the need to minimize the negative impact of performance issues on business goals and cost savings. This trend not only created opportunities for some of the leading CDNs, such as Akamai, Limelight Networks or Mirror Image, to win a new business without having to replace each other, but also created the need for new management capabilities. Organizations that are using multiple CDN services are looking to find the best way to leverage these services and an optimal route for delivering the data. New vendors, such as 3Crowd, are already looking to capitalize on this opportunity by offering capabilities for balancing load between multiple CDNs.
Flexibility of management Organizations are becoming increasingly interested in ensuring that their Web performance management solutions can easily scale up and down and adjust to changes in their business demand. This has especially been a challenge in the market for application delivery solutions as many of them are delivered as hardware appliances. Having to “rip-and-replace” these solutions, because organizations need more management capabilities, is associated with a significant management cost. Crescendo Networks took an innovative approach to solving this problem by introducing their HyperScale product in April of 2010. The product allows organizations to seamlessly add new boxes on top of solutions that they already have in place when they need more capacity, as opposed to forcing them to replace the old products. Additionally, many application delivery appliances now come with multiple functionalities for applications delivery (e.g. load balancing, caching, TCP acceleration, etc.). In some cases, this can create management challenges, as some organizations might not need all of these functionalities and they could interfere with capabilities that are being used. Vendors have recognized this challenge and many of them are providing solutions that allow organizations to turn off capabilities that they do not need. Additionally, flexibility of Web performance management is an attribute that is especially important in the service provider market as application delivery vendors, such as F5, Cisco and Brocade, are increasingly focusing on this sector. SaaS applications TRAC’s survey shows that 74% of organizations that are using SaaS application still rely on data received from their SaaS providers and do not have dedicated tools for managing the performance of these applications. As organizations are becoming increasingly dependent on the performance of these applications, SaaS providers are looking to enhance their capabilities for visibility into the quality of end-user experience for their services. At the same time, end-user organizations are looking for ways to keep their SaaS providers “honest” and deploy third party monitoring tools that would allow them to compare the performance of these applications to SLAs. This creates new opportunities for Web performance monitoring vendors and increases their addressable market, which as a result, new vendors, such as Catchpoint Systems and Yottaa, are entering this market. SMB Many small and medium size businesses that heavily depend on the performance of their websites to grow revenues and achieve other key business goals still do not have some basic capabilities for managing Web performance. Even though they are often justifying a lack of these capabilities with limited IT budgets and the inability to create a business case for these investments, for many of them the true challenge is a lack of visibility into how issues with Web performance are impacting their businesses. As many SMB companies are increasingly depending on the Web to grow their business, this market segment could be one of the key drivers of the future growth of Web performance management solutions. However, traditionally, not many vendors have been providing solutions that would be appealing to this market segment from both technology and cost perspectives. Some of the vendors that have already been able to capitalize on opportunities in this market include Coyote Point and KEMP Technologies. Web Services From a technology perspective, Web Services are not a new concept and organizations have been using applications that draw data from other applications and data sources for a while. However, in 2010, we have seen a trend of organizations becoming increasingly dependent on these services, not only when managing their websites, but also when managing their communications with partners and suppliers. This creates new opportunities for Web performance monitoring vendors and companies, such as Webmetrics, Triometric and AlertSite, have been providing solutions for visibility into the performance of Web services and APIs.
Third-party services 71% of organizations that participated in TRAC’s survey reported that the performance of third party services is creating significant challenges for managing Web performance. Websites are becoming increasingly dependent on third party services, such as social media modules, ads, shopping carts, web analytics, CDN and DNS, and issues with the performance of these services can significantly deteriorate the quality of end-user experience. Additionally, organizations often have very little control of how these services perform on their websites. In order to have more control over the impact of these services on the quality of end-user experience, organizations need to be more proactive and be able to accurately estimate the impact of these services on the performance of their Web applications before they are deployed. Web performance monitoring vendors, such as Gomez, Keynote and Coradiant, have been focusing on this issue and each of them have enhanced their capabilities for monitoring the impact of third party services on the quality of end-user experience. As the Web is playing a more important role in how organizations across different industry sectors are doing business, the importance of the effective management of Web applications is increasing, even more. At the same time, deployments of public cloud services, virtualization technologies, new types of content and changes in end-user preferences for accessing the data are changing the dynamics in the market for Web performance management solutions and forcing vendors to innovate. Even though we have seen some significant changes in this market in 2010, initiatives that end-user organizations are launching and the roadmaps of technology vendors indicate that 2011 could be an even more eventful year. |